Tagged: nick Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Paul Hurst 5:51 pm on October 23, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , conservative, god, griffin, homosexuality, jan, liberal, moir, nick, question, racism, , time,   

    Bullied by the anti-bullies 

    Strange things have been happening recently in liberal circles, have you noticed?

    Yesterday, we had the Anti-Fascist’s ‘protecting democracy’ by demonstrating as an individual chose to use their right of free speech on BBC Television and a few days before that, over 22,000 complaints to the Press Complaints Commission regarding Jan Moir’s admittedly untimely comments surrounding the death of Stephen Gately.  Yes, it seems that anyone who dares to say anything that doesn’t sound like anything else being said (at the time), better watch their back…

    I’m sure the liberals won’t like this post either.  After all, it sounds like I’m anti-gay or racist (or both) just by talking about this, so what should I expect?

    Will I be heckled and hounded on social networking websites?  ‘How dare he say what he said!  What kind of uneducated ignoramus is he?’ #getridofhim.

    Will they express their insult and disgust, maybe demand an apology or arrange a protest, after all regardless of my intent, they have taken offence.

    Will any protest be violent and vandalistic on both sides of the police line?

    Strange things have been happening recently in liberal circles, have you noticed?

    Since when did we live in a country that only allows freedom of speech to those who say only what we want them to?  Since when did we live in a country that announces everybody’s equality although some are more equal than others based upon what they believe in?  And since when did we live in a country where it’s acceptable do what’s wrong to protest for what public opinion thinks may be right?

    I’m not Homophobic, I’m not racist but surely democracy is only democracy when it protects the rights of everybody, not just the ‘liberal elite’.  Some don’t agree with a homosexual lifestyle, some believe that multiculturalism has its dangers.  Does that mean they shouldn’t be afforded the same rights as those who believe otherwise?

    What’s so ‘tolerant and fair’ about a society that demands apologies from people who’s opinions differ?  Come to think about it, what’s so liberal about that either?  Aren’t we in danger of just polarising to the other extremes?

    Surely our society works best when people can say what they think and then those who listen can have their chance too.  Are we not sometimes too quick to take offence?  Aren’t we quick to start inquisitions and character assassinations for anyone who isn’t ‘liberal enough’ for our liking?

    Someone recently linked to the alpha homepage on twitter with this comment:  Don’t forget to vote ‘no’ on this poll.  The question was, ‘is there a God?’.

    I’m sick of being told what I have to think, not just to be popular but to be accepted.  And why should anyone be branded a fool or homophobic racist if they talk about sexuality and race whilst holding an opinion that differs from the left-wing, ‘do-gooders’?  Shouldn’t democracy afford everybody (regardless of sexuality, religion or race) the right to speak and be heard?

    I don’t have to believe what anybody tells me,  I can listen to liberals and conservatives alike.  I can make my own mind up without anybody protesting or complaining whether I want them to or not.  I can reason and speak for myself.

    I clicked ‘Yes’


     
  • Paul Hurst 12:27 pm on May 20, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , brown, date, , , fawkes, , government, grodon, guido, mistake, , nick, , resigns, speaker, , uk   

    What a Twittering idiot! 

    When twittering surely the only rule would be ‘don’t write something you wouldn’t say’ however one of the latest twittering MP’s may have fallen foul in one of his very first updates!

    @nickbrownmp seems to suggest that the UK could indeed be heading for an early general election, this from the ‘virtual mouth’ of he who is responsile for whipping all the Labour MP’s into place (whip harder I say).  The governments chief whip may have meant to say something different however Whitehall tongues are now wagging about the Speakers replacement and a nice shiny new Parliament to go with it.

    Either that or Mr Brown (unfortunate name for a labour MP) was careless with government information which he meant to send privately.  Instead it’s now very much in the the public domain, without the need for losing a memory stick, a CD-ROM and no laptops were needed to be left on public transport either.  Come to think about it, he’s just cutting out the middle man and saving the taxpayer some money by leaking it inadvertently via a free service with no cost to the taxpayer whatsoever!  And who says all our MP’s are on the take…

    (for more on this, visit @guidofawkes blog)

     
c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel