Tagged: resignation Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Paul Hurst 12:27 pm on May 20, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , brown, date, , , fawkes, , government, grodon, guido, mistake, , , resignation, resigns, speaker, , uk   

    What a Twittering idiot! 

    When twittering surely the only rule would be ‘don’t write something you wouldn’t say’ however one of the latest twittering MP’s may have fallen foul in one of his very first updates!

    @nickbrownmp seems to suggest that the UK could indeed be heading for an early general election, this from the ‘virtual mouth’ of he who is responsile for whipping all the Labour MP’s into place (whip harder I say).  The governments chief whip may have meant to say something different however Whitehall tongues are now wagging about the Speakers replacement and a nice shiny new Parliament to go with it.

    Either that or Mr Brown (unfortunate name for a labour MP) was careless with government information which he meant to send privately.  Instead it’s now very much in the the public domain, without the need for losing a memory stick, a CD-ROM and no laptops were needed to be left on public transport either.  Come to think about it, he’s just cutting out the middle man and saving the taxpayer some money by leaking it inadvertently via a free service with no cost to the taxpayer whatsoever!  And who says all our MP’s are on the take…

    (for more on this, visit @guidofawkes blog)

    Advertisements
     
  • Paul Hurst 3:49 pm on May 18, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: apology, commons, costs, , house, martin, michael, money, , , repentance, resignation, , sack, sacked, sackings, services, tax, taxes   

    Sorry seems to be the ‘easiest’ word to say… 

    As the MP’s gather in the House of Commons to hear the Speaker of the House apologise, what should we make of the contrition shown by so many of our elected officials?

    The speaker of the house, Michael Martin isn’t just ‘sorry’.  He’s ‘profoundly sorry’ but would all of these honourable individuals be sorry if they had not been caught with their hands in our cookie jar?  To express sorrow after an event can be quite natural.  Sometimes we all make mistakes, some of which may require an apology.  but sometimes ‘sorry’ isn’t enough.

    Without sounding too religious,  repentance is sometimes requred when mistakes are made.  It isn’t just good enough to talk about how we feel, we have to talk about what we are going to do about it.

    Its also commonplace in the UK for the public to be quick to demand heads to roll.  People bay for blood, they require resignations and somehow feel that these actions will somehow right any wrongs, especially when ‘sorry’ is clearly not enough.  However more job losses and resignations only contribute to the credit crunch rather than restoring public faith in public services.

    Surely sometimes, its better to move forward with repentant individuals, who recognise their mistakes.  Isn’t it better to allow people who are ‘profoundly sorry’ to contine in office if only just to resolve their wrongs?  A new brush may indeed sweep clean however what good is it if some things are merely swept under the carpet?

     
c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel